Commentary for Bava Kamma 150:17

אמר רב אחא בריה דרב איקא לא דכולי עלמא הודאה דטביחה לאו הודאה היא

for would Symmachus not agree that a testimony becoming annulled regarding a part of it should become annulled regarding the whole of it? If again he referred to the concluding clause,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where the witnesses to the slaughter or sale were proved zomemim. ');">¹⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 150:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.